Legal Opinion

State v. . Proctor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 200 N. C., 831. Rule 28. Appellant's Brief, in part: “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned by him.”

In defendant’s brief there is only one exception and assignment of error, which is to the charge of the court below, which we think cannot be sustained, viz.: “The State contends that you ought to be convinced of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The State contends that while the accomplices, Brinkley and Proctor, are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. State v. . BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Sorrells v. . DeckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Braddy v. . PfaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. CaronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. CaronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API