Legal Opinion

Whiteman v. Seashore Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1950No. 379PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The appellant Seashore Transportation Company assigns error in the ruling of the court below in allowing the motion of the defendant Construction Company for nonsuit as to plaintiff’s causes of action against the Construction Company. This motion was interposed and ruled upon at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. As the evidence which bad been offered by tbe plaintiff bad failed to show actionable negligence on tbe part of defendant Construction Company, we tbink tbe movent was entitled to tbe allowance of its motion, in so far as tbe plaintiff was concerned, and tbe plaintiff did not except…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Collins v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barber v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Rudd Ex Rel. Rudd v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Childers v. SeaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Potato Co. v. . JeannetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. O'Briant v. O'BriantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API