Legal Opinion
Vincenzo v. Warden
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 12, 1991No. 9593PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a habeas corpus petition that requires this court to explore the outer limits of jurisdiction relative to the ephemeral and complex boundaries of the Great Writ.1
The petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly dismissed his petition because it failed to find that the state board of parole is subject to the rule-making provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), General Statutes § 4-166 et seq. The habeas court dismissed the petition upon determining that the petitioner’s claimed right to parole was not an interest sufficient to…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Abed v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Santiago v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. BookerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Baker v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.