Legal Opinion

Gaskin v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 24, 2018No. AC39462PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

It has been usual for trial judges, when instructing jurors on how to weigh the credibility of witnesses, to tell them to consider whether the witness has an interest of whatever sort in the outcome of the trial that might influence or color the witness' testimony. In the petitioner's criminal trial, however, the jury never received important evidence of a cooperating witness' interest in the outcome. This appeal requires us to examine a situation where a necessary cooperating witness, the only one who put the defendant at the crime scene with the likely murder weapon in his hand, falsely…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gomez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. State v. BetheaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. Figueroa v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Inglis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  5. Saunders v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API