Legal Opinion

Winsor v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 12, 2007No. AC 27750PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Connecticut’s implied consent law, General Statutes § 14-227b, 1 directs police officers to prepare a written report whenever a person refuses to submit to a blood, breath or urine analysis. The statute further mandates that “a third person who witnessed such refusal” endorse the report on the incident. The issue in this appeal is whether a third party may “witness” such a refusal by observing it contemporaneously on closed circuit television.* 2 The defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner), suspended the license of the plaintiff, Michael W. Winsor, after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Renaissance Management Co. v. Connecticut Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Roy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Santiago v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Do v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. State v. WatersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  5. Crandlemire v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API