Winsor v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
Connecticut’s implied consent law, General Statutes § 14-227b, 1 directs police officers to prepare a written report whenever a person refuses to submit to a blood, breath or urine analysis. The statute further mandates that “a third person who witnessed such refusal” endorse the report on the incident. The issue in this appeal is whether a third party may “witness” such a refusal by observing it contemporaneously on closed circuit television.* 2 The defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner), suspended the license of the plaintiff, Michael W. Winsor, after…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Renaissance Management Co. v. Connecticut Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Roy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Santiago v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Do v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. WatersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Crandlemire v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.