Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 10, 2012No. AC 32973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183, the plaintiff, Jose R. Santiago, Jr., commenced an administrative appeal in the Superior Court from the decision of the defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles, suspending his motor vehicle operator’s license for ten months and his commercial driver’s license for life. Following a hearing, the court dismissed that appeal. The plaintiff now challenges the propriety of that determination. Specifically, he claims that the defendant erred in (1) admitting into evidence certain documents at the administrative hearing, (2) finding that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. State v. SandovalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mills v. Solution, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Fitzgerald v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Prendergast. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API