Legal Opinion

Do v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 19, 2016No. AC37712 DissentPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

"It is axiomatic that administrative tribunals are not strictly bound by the rules of evidence.... [T]hey may consider exhibits [that] would normally be incompetent in a judicial proceeding, so long as the evidence is reliable and probative." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Gagliardi v. Commissioner of Children & Families, 155 Conn.App. 610 , 619, 110 A.3d 512 , cert. denied, 316 Conn. 917 , 113 A.3d 70 (2015). It is a rare case in which a decision by an administrative hearing officer to admit an exhibit will be reversed for an abuse of discretion. Principles of fundamental fairness…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. State v. GenottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Do v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Do v. Comm'r of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Marshall v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API