Do v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
"It is axiomatic that administrative tribunals are not strictly bound by the rules of evidence.... [T]hey may consider exhibits [that] would normally be incompetent in a judicial proceeding, so long as the evidence is reliable and probative." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Gagliardi v. Commissioner of Children & Families, 155 Conn.App. 610 , 619, 110 A.3d 512 , cert. denied, 316 Conn. 917 , 113 A.3d 70 (2015). It is a rare case in which a decision by an administrative hearing officer to admit an exhibit will be reversed for an abuse of discretion. Principles of fundamental fairness…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. GenottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Do v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Do v. Comm'r of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Marshall v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022