Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 22, 2000No. SC 16193PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The dispositive issues in this appeal are: (1) whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the evidence in the administrative record was insufficient to establish probable cause that the plaintiff, Mary Ellen Murphy, had violated General Statutes § 14-227a;1 and (2) whether the evidence in the administrative record was sufficient to establish that *335the plaintiff had operated her motor vehicle.2 The defendant, commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner), appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which reversed the trial court’s judgment dismissing the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. EadySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. HeinzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Dolgner v. AlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. CruzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Jim's Auto Body v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.