Legal Opinion
Bangle v. Holland Realty Investment Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1964No. 4720PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
Holland, a licensed real estate broker, brought suit against Bangle and Palomar Associates to recover commissions for selling houses in the Sunset Manor Subdivision, Las Vegas, Nevada. He won below. A jury awarded him $38,800 against all defendants, and judgment was entered. This appeal followed. As we see it, the judgment cannot stand, for it necessarily rests upon an “exclusive listing” agreement which, because of its failure to contain a definite termination date, is not enforcible as a matter of law.
In brief the record shows that Palomar Associates…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gifford v. StraubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- Whiteman v. BrandisNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- W. Ross Campbell Co. v. Herbert's of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Karl M. Elbinger Co. v. George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by21 opinions
- Weichert Co. Realtors v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Union Oil Company of California v. Terrible Herbst, Inc., Union Oil Company of California, Dba/unocal, a California Corporation v. Terrible Herbst, Inc., a Nevada CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ewing v. SargentNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Morrow v. BargerNevada Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.