W. Ross Campbell Co. v. Herbert's of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
The defendant was the owner or in the possession of certain storerooms at what were known as Nos. 745 to 749 South Hill Street, in the city of Los Angeles. The storeroom at No. 745 was separate and apart from the remainder of the premises, the latter of which were occupied by defendant in the operation of its business as a restaurant. The plaintiff is a corporation acting as a broker in the business of selling and leasing real property. Through an employee of the plaintiff it solicited from the defendant the business of procuring a tenant for such storeroom at No. 745 South Hill Street, and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Bangle v. Holland Realty Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Neiswender v. E. B. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962