Legal Opinion

Whiteman v. Brandis

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1962No. 4491PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

Brandis, plaintiff below, performed architectural services for Whiteman at the latter’s request. The district court found the reasonable value of such services to be $4,750 and entered judgment in that amount, with costs. Whiteman appeals, contending that reversible error occurred in permitting a quantum meruit recovery when the complaint alleged a breach of an express contract and proof of such a contract was not made. The appellant admits that he could not successfully assail the judgment, had the complaint requested relief on a quantum meruit basis.

We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Maitia v. Allied L. & L. S. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Berrum v. GeorgettaNevada Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Drilling Service Co. v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bangle v. Holland Realty Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ewing v. SargentNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Close v. Isbell Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API