Whiteman v. Brandis
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
Brandis, plaintiff below, performed architectural services for Whiteman at the latter’s request. The district court found the reasonable value of such services to be $4,750 and entered judgment in that amount, with costs. Whiteman appeals, contending that reversible error occurred in permitting a quantum meruit recovery when the complaint alleged a breach of an express contract and proof of such a contract was not made. The appellant admits that he could not successfully assail the judgment, had the complaint requested relief on a quantum meruit basis.
We…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Maitia v. Allied L. & L. S. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1926
- Berrum v. GeorgettaNevada Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Drilling Service Co. v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Schwartz v. SchwartzNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Bangle v. Holland Realty Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Ewing v. SargentNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Close v. Isbell Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.