Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 2004No. C7-03-94PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*322OPINION
HANSON, Justice.
Appellant Gary Rosenberg, a licensed real estate broker, seeks review of a grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim for commissions on condominium sales that closed after his listing agreement was terminated. The main questions presented are whether Rosenberg’s agreement with respondent Heritage Marketing LLC (“Marketing”) was terminable-at-will and, if so, whether Rosenberg was due any commissions on purchase agreements or reservation agreements that he obtained before termination but that closed after termination. Inherent in the latter question is the issue…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- M.H. v. Caritas Family ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Glen Johnson v. Charps Welding & FabricatingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.