Morrow v. Barger
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
I. Claire Morrow claims she is entitled to a real estate broker’s commission pursuant to a written listing agreement, an oral listing agreement or an implied listing agreement for the sale of the ranch of Fay and Anne Barger. The district court granted the Bargers’ motion for summary judgment concluding as a matter of law that no employment agreement existed and that Claire Morrow was not the procuring cause of the sale.
The Facts
For several years prior to 1979, Fay Barger and Anne Barger had been attempting to sell their Nevada ranch through several diiferent brokers. On March 7, 1979,…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. LevertonNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Bangle v. Holland Realty Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Close v. RedeliusNevada Supreme Court · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Wiltsie v. Baby Grand Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- MacKintosh v. Jack Matthews and Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Flamingo Realty, Inc. v. Midwest Development, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Asphalt Products Corp. v. All Star Ready Mix, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Garshman Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.