Legal Opinion

Davis v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1998No. B101744PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

The trial court awarded Willie L. and Joyce Davis (the Davises) $20,000 from the Real Estate Recovery Account (Recovery Account) to compensate them for fraud perpetrated by a real estate salesperson who performed acts outside the scope of his license. The California Department of Real Estate (the Department) challenges the award, arguing that it was improper under a statutory amendment to Business and Professions Code section 10471, subdivision (a) which became effective January 1, 1987. (All further statutory references are to this code.) The Department contends the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Froid v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Vinci v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Overend v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Garrett v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Worthington v. DaviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Badger Meter Inc. v. Vintage Water Works Supply, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. Alves v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API