Legal Opinion
Froid v. Fox
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 1982No. Civ. 53288PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MILLER, J.
This appeal involves seven applications for payment from the Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund (hereinafter Fund). The trial court granted recovery to two applicants but reduced their recovery by the amount of their tax writeoff. Five of the applicants were denied recovery on the ground that the realtor’s fraud had not involved licensed activity. All the applicants appeal from this judgment.
In 1972 Fred Niergarth, a licensed real estate broker, doing business as Investment Administrators entered into a lease option agreement with Gem Properties, whereby…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Webb v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Tremeroli v. Austin Trailer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cody v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Robert Lee Thomas, Debtor. Robert & Karen Lucas v. Robert Lee Thomas, California Real Estate Recovery Fund, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Booth v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Danzig v. Jack Grynberg & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.