Legal Opinion

Quarry v. Doe I

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2012No. S171382PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought an action against the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, alleging that defendant bore responsibility for sexual abuse committed during the 1970’s by a priest then assigned to the *952Oakland diocese. Plaintiffs allege that in 2006 they discovered for the first time that the cause of their adult psychological injuries was the sexual abuse inflicted by this priest when they were children. It is our task to determine whether their claims are timely within the limitations period established by Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1.1

Section 340.1 governs…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lopez v. Sony Electronics, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
  4. McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
  5. North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API