Overend v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, Acting P. J.
—Appellant Robert E. Overend was retired for disability as a “state miscellaneous” member of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). He subsequently sought reclassification as a “state safety” member. (Gov. Code, § 20013, subd. (b).) Respondent Board of Administration of PERS determined that appellant was properly classified as a miscellaneous member and not entitled to safety member status. The trial court upheld the board’s decision by denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.)
We affirm. Appellant was not entitled to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Neeley v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Noroian v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Kimball v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Boxx v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Richman v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Richman v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Richman v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021