Legal Opinion

Overend v. Board of Administration

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1991No. B052075PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, Acting P. J.

—Appellant Robert E. Overend was retired for disability as a “state miscellaneous” member of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). He subsequently sought reclassification as a “state safety” member. (Gov. Code, § 20013, subd. (b).) Respondent Board of Administration of PERS determined that appellant was properly classified as a miscellaneous member and not entitled to safety member status. The trial court upheld the board’s decision by denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.)

We affirm. Appellant was not entitled to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Neeley v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Noroian v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Kimball v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Boxx v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Richman v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Richman v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Richman v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API