Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vinci v. Edmonds

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1986No. B017679PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

The Real Estate Commissioner of the State of California (Commissioner) appeals from a judgment directing payment of $15,000 to Robert and Margaret Vinci out of the Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 10470 et seq.). We affirm.

The relevant facts and chronology are as follows: In 1979 Eugene Kennedy met the Vincis in the course of selling a home belonging to Margaret Vinci’s brother. Kennedy falsely represented to the Vincis that he was a licensed real estate broker and the owner of Dynamic Realty Company. In reality, he was licensed as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Booth v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Davis v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Edmonds v. AugustynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Doyle v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Dierenfield v. StabileCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API