Mangold & Glandt Bank v. Utterback
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error ifom District Court, Caddo Counity; Cham Jones, Judge. Suit by the Mangold & Glandt Bank against W. T. 'Utterback. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
The facts here are as follows: The plaintiff in error is ’ a banking institution organized under the laws of the state of Nebraska, and has been engaged as such for 10 years or more prior to the institution of this suit. About September 1, 1911, the Denver-Laramie Realty Company and the Colorado-Wyoming Coal Company, which were subsidiary corporations to the Northwestern Land & Iron Company, sold, delivered, and indorsed four certain promissory notes to the bank, and in order to secure the payment of the aforesaid notes said companies deposited as collateral security the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Werline v. AldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lambert v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Stevens v. ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cox v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Voris v. BirdsallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thompson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Schaff v. HudginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Voss v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Helms v. BulingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Stout v. MottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924