Legal Opinion
Voris v. Birdsall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 23, 1917No. 5277PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from District Court, Beaver County ; R. H. Loofbourrow, Judge. Action by E. C. Voris against Charles N. Birdsall and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JOHNSON, 0.
This case is upon rehearing. Upon the former hearing of the cause in this court an opinion was written and filed herein upon June 27, 1916, by Mr. Commissioner Rittenhouse, which, in part, was as follows:
"On December 11, 1907, the defendants made, executed, and delivered their three promissory notes to R. F. Dygert which were indorsed by him, and subsequently indorsed by L. W. Cochran. This action was brought by E. C. Voris, who claims to be the owner and holder thereof in due course. It is contended by the defendants that these notes, amounting to $2,100; were given in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Hotchkiss v. National BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanna v. GreggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Francen v. Oklahoma Star Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Lima Oil & Gas Co. v. PritchardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Cohen v. Superior Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936