Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 16, 1916No. 5995PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by G. I. Smith against Sam C. Lambert. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Alfalfa county. • Plaintiff,. Smith, brought action against Lambert, to recover on a negotiable promissory note in the sum of $1,000 given by said Lambert and before maturity indorsed by the payee, Yennum, to plaintiff. Defendant answered, charging, in effect, that said note .was without consideration, and was fraudulently procured from him by Yennum and one Ceideburg, and that plaintiff knew at the time or was in possession of facts and information such that his action in taking the note amounted to bad faith. The trial resulted in a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Kauffman & Runge v. RobeyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Besse v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. F. B. Collins Inv. Co. v. WaideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Board of Ed. v. American National Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Gragg v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API