Legal Opinion

Cox v. Kirkwood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1916No. 7556PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Cherokee County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by J. JT. Cox against J. T. Kirk-wood and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This action was instituted to recover on four certain promissory notes for $700 each, in which it is alleged that the notes were made payable to Edward T. Philpot, and by him sold and assigned to the plaintiff. J. P. Cox, for a valuable consideration, before due and in due course. The defendants answered, admitting their signatures, and alleging that they executed certain notes as the purchase price of a stallion, the sale of which was not coir-■summated: that the consideration of said notes failed; that the same were procured by fraudulent misrepresentation; that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Richardson v. FellnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Ireland v. ShoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Horn v. Newton City BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Seddicum v. SeddicumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Bailey v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Mangold & Glandt Bank v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Dunkin v. Waurika Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API