Legal Opinion
Peabody Galion Corp. v. Kropp
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1983No. 55526PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Vice Chief Justice:
This case presents two issues for review: (1) After filing of petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court, was the Court of Appeals divested of authority to issue an order awarding attorney fees to respondent? (2) Does 85 O.S.1981, § 30 provide that the Court of Appeals may award additional attorneys’ fees?
The Workers’ Compensation Court originally found that respondent, Gary Kropp, suffered an occupational disease with 3% permanent partial disability to his respiratory system. On appeal, the Workers’ Compensation Court en banc modified the trial court’s order by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- City National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Becknell v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- MB Contracting Company v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chamberlain v. American AirlinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Wieland v. Danner Auto Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Wendell Phillips and Wanda Phillips v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Evans v. SittonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Thompson v. Duke Construction Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.