Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Duke Construction Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1984No. 60723PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, Judge.

Petitioner’s present two issues on appeal: (1) whether there was competent evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Claimant, Eddie Thompson, sustained a physical change of condition for the worse; and, (2) whether the trial court’s order is too indefinite and uncertain for legal interpretation.

In 1981, Eddie Thompson [Claimant] sustained an accidental personal injury to his right foot which arose out of and in the course of his employment with Duke Construction Company [Employer]. When Claimant stepped into a hole in which an auger was operating, his right foot was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Zinc Company v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. City of Frederick v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. National Zinc Co., Inc. v. DewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Peabody Galion Corp. v. KroppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Reaves v. Uniroyal Tire Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. GuthrieCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. PrattCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Wald v. Roto RooterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API