Legal Opinion

MB Contracting Company v. Davis

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1965No. 500PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

By this appeal the appellant employer,. M-B Contracting Company, seeks to have-reviewed the superior court’s award of an-attorney’s fee to counsel for Charles Davis, the injured workman, for representing Davis in the proceeding before the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) in spite of the fact that the employer was the prevailing party when the award of compensation-by the Board was appealed to the superior-court. As a consequential proposition, the-employer contends that it should have been-awarded an attorney’s fee and not the injured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Davidsen v. KirklandAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wick Roofing Company v. CurtisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NY v. KennardNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. RUTH ET UX v. HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cooper v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API