Legal Opinion
Wieland v. Danner Auto Supply, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 26, 1984No. 61123PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Vice Chief Justice:
Appeal by plaintiff below from the trial court’s order denying plaintiff’s motion to tax costs and attorney fees on a judgment by confession entered against defendants below pursuant to 12 O.S.1981 § 1101.
The parties will be referred to by their trial court designations.
Although plaintiff’s original petition is not included in the record, it appears from the facts related by the parties that plaintiff, Albert Wieland, Jr., brought an action on November 6, 1981, against defendant Danner Auto Supply based on plaintiff’s purchase of a motor and parts that were allegedly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Parker v. MatthewsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Dulan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Carter v. RubrechtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Peabody Galion Corp. v. KroppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Parker Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Howell Petroleum Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Samson Resources Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Hicks v. Lloyd's General Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. North American Van LinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.