Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1979No. 50794PublishedCited by 292 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

This appeal by the City of Oklahoma City arises from an order fixing the amount of attorney’s fees to be paid from a common, equitable fund created for the City through the efforts of attorneys for named appel-lees. A history of this litigation and authority of the trial court to award attorney fees from the equitable fund is found in State ex rel. Burk et al. v. City of Oklahoma City et al., Okl, 522 P.2d 612 (1974). See, also State ex rel. Burk et al. v. City of Oklahoma City, Okl., 556 P.2d 591 (1976).

The sole issue to be decided in the instant appeal is whether or not the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel Lorraine Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, Hotel & Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. National Association of Regional Medical Programs, Inc. v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by292 opinions

  1. Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API