Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Galvin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1985No. A028524PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

Plaintiff Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers) appeals from a declaratory judgment finding that defendant’s “moped” is not a “motor vehicle” within the meaning of plaintiff’s insurance policy exclusion clause and that defendants are entitled to uninsured motorist benefits. We affirm.

On August 22, 1982, defendant’s son, Michael, was injured while riding defendant’s moped. The driver of the other vehicle involved in the accident was an uninsured motorist. Plaintiff’s policy, entitled “Your E-Z-Reader Car Policy,” provided uninsured motorist coverage and was in effect at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finn v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Armstrong v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Harbor Insurance v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Mori v. Southern General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API