Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Galvin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LOW, P. J.
Plaintiff Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers) appeals from a declaratory judgment finding that defendant’s “moped” is not a “motor vehicle” within the meaning of plaintiff’s insurance policy exclusion clause and that defendants are entitled to uninsured motorist benefits. We affirm.
On August 22, 1982, defendant’s son, Michael, was injured while riding defendant’s moped. The driver of the other vehicle involved in the accident was an uninsured motorist. Plaintiff’s policy, entitled “Your E-Z-Reader Car Policy,” provided uninsured motorist coverage and was in effect at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Finn v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Armstrong v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Harbor Insurance v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mori v. Southern General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987