Legal Opinion

Finn v. Continental Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1990No. A045652PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

Where a homeowner’s broad peril policy for property damage excludes damage from “continuous or repeated seepage or leakage” from the plumbing system, the insurer cannot be made liable for such leakage damage on the theory that the efficient proximate cause of the leakage was a sudden break in the pipe, an included peril.

Eileen Finn, as executrix of the will of her mother, Mary Finn, sued Continental Insurance Company for breach of contract and bad faith, arising from defendant’s failure to pay a claim on Mary Finn’s homeowner’s policy. The superior court granted defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sauer v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Premier Insurance v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. GalvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Von Der LiethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Chadwick v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Pieper v. Commercial Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. American Concept Insurance v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
  5. State ex rel. State Fire & Tornado Fund of the North Dakota Insurance DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API