Legal Opinion

Potocan v. Hamilton Coal & Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 6, 1926No. 26,637PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*327The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff sustained a double rupture and other alleged injuries in his employer’s coal mine: The employer paid him compensation at the rate of $15 per week for ten weeks, and then quit paying on the assumption that plaintiff had fully recovered.

Plaintiff applied to the district court for the appointment of an arbitrator. This was granted. Lay and professional witnesses testified and were cross-examined by the litigants before the arbitrator, who found that plaintiff was totally incapacitated as the result of an accident while he was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Bidnick v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Kinzer v. Wyandotte County Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Bortnick v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Cowan v. George W. Kerford Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Schmeling v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API