Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The decision of the court was delivered by Beier, J.:
*511This case requires us once again to examine the constitutionality of K.S.A. 60-19a02, which caps jury awards for noneconomic damages in personal injury actions. Plaintiff Diana K. Hilburn argues that the application of K.S.A. 60-19a02 to reduce her jury award of $ 335,000 to a judgment of $ 283,490.86 violated her rights under section 5 and section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights.
In Miller v. Johnson , 295 Kan. 636, 289 P.3d 1098 (2012), a majority of this court upheld the application of the noneconomic damages cap to a medical…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- Stroud v. Ozark Nat'l Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- Corvias Military Living, LLC v. Ventamatic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- In re A.B.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.