Legal Opinion

Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 14, 2019No. 112765Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,765 DIANA K. HILBURN, Appellant, v. ENERPIPE LTD., Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights declares, "The right of trial by jury shall be inviolate." The quid pro quo test that has been applied to analyze challenges under section 18 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights is inapplicable to challenges under section 5. The noneconomic damages cap under K.S.A. 60-19a02 violates the right protected by section 5, because it intrudes upon the jury's determination of the compensation owed personal…

2Cases cited102 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API