Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Neosho district court; James W. Finley, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
The first opinion in this case is reported in Shade v. Cement Co., 92 Kan. 146, 139 Pac. 1193, construing provisions of the workmen’s com-, pensation act. (Laws 1911, ch. 218, as amended by Laws 1913, ch. 216.) A rehearing having been allowed, elaborate briefs have been filed by the parties and *258others amici curise. Other cases interpreting the same statute in which opinions are now filed were argued at the sae time. (McRoberts v. Zinc Co., post; Gorrell v. Battelle, post.)
It was held in the former opinion that where the employer and employee…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- State v. Mountain Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.