Legal Opinion

Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 14, 1914No. 18,793PublishedCited by 48 opinions

OPINION ON REHEARING. Appeal from Neosho district court; James W. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The first opinion in this case is reported in Shade v. Cement Co., 92 Kan. 146, 139 Pac. 1193, construing provisions of the workmen’s com-, pensation act. (Laws 1911, ch. 218, as amended by Laws 1913, ch. 216.) A rehearing having been allowed, elaborate briefs have been filed by the parties and *258others amici curise. Other cases interpreting the same statute in which opinions are now filed were argued at the sae time. (McRoberts v. Zinc Co., post; Gorrell v. Battelle, post.)

It was held in the former opinion that where the employer and employee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. State v. Mountain Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  5. Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API