Legal Opinion

Schmeling v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1933No. 31,094PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:'

This is an action to recover damages at common law for personal injuries sustained while the plaintiff, as a saleswoman, was in the employ of the defendant at its five- and ten-cent store in Atchison.

The real question involved is whether the defendant was by election operating under the workmen’s compensation law at the time of the accident, it being conceded that the defendant belonged to the nonhazardous class as defined by that law.

The answer admitted the employment of the plaintiff and that it maintained a mercantile business at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. HentigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Balch v. GlennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. City of AbileneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Hauserman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Osborn v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Leslie v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Thorp v. Victory Cab Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Horyna v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Greenwood v. Blackjack Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API