Legal Opinion

McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1974PublishedCited by 174 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is a negligence action involving the liability of a manufacturer of ethical drugs ① for its alleged failure to make timely, adequate warnings to the medical profession of dangers which the manufacturer knows, or has reason to know, are inherent in the use of its drug.

Freda McEwen brought this action against defendants, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation and Syntex Laboratories, Inc. (hereinafter Ortho and Syntex, respectively), to recover damages for blindness in her right eye and injuries to her left eye. In her complaint, Mrs. McEwen alleged that each defendant faded to adequately warn…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Leibowitz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by174 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API