Legal Opinion

Leibowitz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 593 and 594PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

per Curiam,

The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

in Support of Affirmance:

This appeal involves two lawsuits which were consolidated for trial. One action was in Trespass alleging negligence, the other in Assumpsit alleging breach of express and implied warranties. On September 8, 1970, the late Judge Joseph Sloane of the Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia, sitting without a jury, found for the defendant. Post trial motions were denied by a court en banc, and this appeal followed.

The original causes of action were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API