Legal Opinion
Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2003No. 02-8099PublishedCited by 380 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Steven and Marcia Thom (the “Thoms”) appeal from an order granting Defendant-Appellee Bristol-Myers Squibb’s motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction over this diversity-based products liability action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
Background
The Thoms allege that Mr. Thom suffered personal injuries as a result of his use of Serzone (nefazodone), a prescription antidepressant medication manufactured by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). According to the Thoms, Mr. Thom’s use of Ser-zone caused him to develop priapism, a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by380 opinions
- Lundstrom v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Meridia Products Liability Litigation, Steering Committee v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Meridia Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Paul Schilf v. Eli Lilly & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
375 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.