Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 30, 1984PublishedCited by 242 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

SCHREIBER, J.

In this case defendants and amici drug manufacturers argued that the doctrine of strict products liability should not apply to prescription drugs. We hold otherwise and conclude that drug manufacturers have a duty to warn of dangers of which they know or should have known on the basis of reasonably obtainable or available knowledge.

Plaintiff, Carol Ann Feldman, has gray teeth as a result of taking a tetracyline drug, Declomycin. Plaintiff’s father, a pharmacist and a medical doctor, prescribed and administered the drug to her when she was…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  5. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by242 opinions

  1. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API