In re Watson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejections of all the claims (claims 1-6) under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, and 112 (first paragraph) and of claims 1, 2, and 4 — 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (second paragraph) in appellant’s patent application Serial No. 64,126,1 filed July 31, 1970, for “ORAL COMPOSITIONS.” We reverse all rejections.
*466 The Application Disclosure
Appellant’s application describes the invention in the following way:
This invention relates to oral compositions.
It has been proposed to include…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Charles T. FuettererCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Frank E. HalleckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In re JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re JollesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- In re SichertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc. And Unique Beverage Dispensers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.