Legal Opinion
Application of Frank E. Halleck
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 12, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8280PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1, 3, 11-13, 17-19, 27-30 and 34 in appellant’s application entitled “Method and Composition for Regulating Animal Growth.” 1 No claims have been allowed.
The invention, we are told, is based upon the discovery that relatively small amounts of peristalsis- 2 inhibiting drugs, when properly. administered with the water or feed of animals or as a separate material, either orally or parenterally, are effective for increasing the growth rate or increasing the feed efficiency of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Lynn B. Wakefield and Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Marion J. CaldwellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
3Cited by12 opinions
- Application of Carl F. Swinehart and Marko SfiligojCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Janis RobinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of John Nicholson Gardner, Anthony Maitland Roe and George Lawrence WilleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.