F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. Finney
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences awarded priority in Interference No. 102,429 to the senior party, Dr. Roy P. Fin-ney. The Board held that the junior party, Dr. F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton, did not show a reduction to practice before Dr. Finney’s date of invention. Because the Board imposed an overly strict requirement for testing to show reduction to practice, this court reverses and remands.
BACKGROUND
This interference involves Dr. Finney’s United States Patent No. 4,791,917, which was accorded the benefit of its May 15, 1980 parent application, and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Johnson & Johnson and Personal Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- John H. Coleman v. Martin B. DinesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. And Bard Access Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Peter B. Cooper v. David GoldfarbCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ez Dock, Inc. v. Schafer Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Estee Lauder Inc. v. L'oreal, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard KeilhauerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.