Legal Opinion
In re Johnson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 16, 1977No. Patent Appeal No. 76-643PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals affirming the rejection under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 or 103 (the rejection also raises a written description issue under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph) of claims 1-9, 64, and 68-70 and the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (enablement) and second paragraph (indefiniteness), of claims 64 and 68-72 in appellants’ application No. 230,091 filed February 28, 1972 (the 1972 application) for “Polyarylene Po-lyethers.” 1 The 1972 application is a continuation-in-part of three…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Charles T. FuettererCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Santarus, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In re DriscollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In Re Robert C. Sneed and Joseph C. Young, and E-Z Lay Pipe Corp. And Stream Line, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. LillyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Inphi Corporation v. Netlist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.