Legal Opinion

Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. Brandes

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 12, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6741PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of appealed claims 30-34, 38 and 39 of appellants’ application, Serial No. 418,468, for a patent on a “Therapeutic Composition.” Certain claims were withdrawn from consideration by the examiner “as not being readable on the elected species” and are not before us. No claim has been allowed.

Each of the claims recites a “stable” solution of a “thiobarbituric acid compound.” Claims 30 and 31 are representative :

“30. A stable solution of a thiobarbituric acid compound having…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Application of Carl Peter KrimmelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. FennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Isenstead v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  4. Payne v. HurleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. Morway v. BondiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  2. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Application of Alick Isaacs and Jean LindenmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API