Legal Opinion
In re Sichert
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 15, 1977No. 77-546PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) rejecting claims 1-21 in application serial No. 360,935,1 filed May 16, 1973, for “Therapeutical Composition.” We reverse the rejection of claims 2-4, 6-8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, and 19, and affirm the rejection of claims 1, 5, 9-11, 14, 17, 20, and 21.
*1156THE INVENTION
The therapeutical compositions embraced by the claims comprise mixtures of extracts from plants of the Umbelliferae, Liliaceae, Berberidaceae, and Solanaceae families (one extract per family) and an extract of a plant which…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Joseph D. FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re SarettUnited States Customs Court · 1964
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ralston Purina Company v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Anita Dembiczak and Benson ZinbargCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- Weil v. FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.