Shockency v. Jefferson Lines
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
Jefferson Lines appeals a decision of the Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights which was affirmed by the court of appeals. The commission determined that Jefferson had discriminatorily discharged employee Lee Shockency and subjected him to disparate treatment based on race and color. At issue are whether the proceedings before the Commission lacked fundamental fairness and whether the employee proved that racial discrimination underlay his termination. Because we find the evidence insufficient to prove the termination was a pretext for racial discrimination, we reverse.
R…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 11, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,084 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Brown & Root, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lindgren v. Harmon Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Minneapolis Police Department v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Kolstad v. Fairway Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Villarreal v. Independent School District No. 659Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.