Legal Opinion
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 15, 2017No. A16-1515PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge
On this certiorari appeal, relator challenges the denial of its protest to a request for proposals for the operation of municipal public transit services. Because the request for proposals includes a provision that creates an impermissible appearance of bias, we x-everse.
FACTS
For decades, relator Rochester City Lines Co. (RCL) operated fixed-route public transit services in respondent City of Rochester under a series of noncompetitive contracts with the city. In 2011, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) informed the city that, to continue to receive federal funding…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Nkf Engineering, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Weidlinger Associates, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Powell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018