Legal Opinion

Carey v. Discount Corp.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1941No. 2455PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

The suggestion was made by the defendant-appellee that Mr. Justice Peters was disqualified to sit upon the appeal of the within cause for the reason that both he and his wife had a pecuniary interest in the issue thereof within the meaning of the provisions of section 84 of the Hawaiian Organic Act. The plaintiff-appellant demurred to the suggestion of disqualification on both general and special grounds upon the latter of which the demurrer was sustained with leave to the defendant-appellee, upon application therefor, to amend. (See per curiam, ante, p. 786.)

W…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. City of Vallejo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In re the Estate of LevyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Utz & Dunn Co. v. Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RossHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API