Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1999No. 20901PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

We granted certiorari to review the memorandum opinion of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA), filed on August 27, 1998. The ICA vacated the trial court’s conviction of respondent-defendant-appellant Henry Ross (Ross) on one count of harassment and remanded for a new trial. The ICA also held that: 1) the complaint sufficiently apprised Ross of the charges against him; 2) the trial court denied Ross his right to presentence allocution; 3) the trial court improperly con sidered Ross’s purported inability to pay a fine as a factor in imposing a jail…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. George Del Vecchio, Cross-Appellee v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Michael Lovaglia, Martin Clune and Peter PavlisakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Jou v. Dai-Tokyo Royal State Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. RapozaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API