Utz & Dunn Co. v. Regulator Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah; John A. Marshall, Judge. In the matter of the Regulator Company, alleged bankrupt, and •others. The Utz & Dunn Company and others, petitioning creditors, appeal from an order dismissing their petition.
1Opinion of the Court
HOOK, Circuit Judge.
Thiá is an appeal by petitioning creditors from an order of the District Court refusing to adjudge the Regulator Company > a mercantile corporation of Utah, a bankrupt. , The sole act of bankruptcy charged was that the bankrupt had made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. It was necessary that at least three creditors petition for the adjudication. Section 59b, Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 561 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3445]). Three creditors petitioned, namely, the Utz & Dunn Company, W. F. Bland, and Ernest Chambers. Bland and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Randolph v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- McClaughry v. DemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Barnes v. McMullinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Harrington v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- In Re Fox West Coast TheatresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Ohio Motor Car Co. v. Eiseman Magneto Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.