Hall v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This proceeding in prohibition was instituted to restrain the judges of the superior court in and for the county of Imperial from further participating in an action pending in said court. The writ is sought upon the ground that the said judges are disqualified under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure to sit or act in said action by virtue of their alleged interest 'in the subject matter of said action and are further disqualified by virtue of the provisions of subdivision 5 of section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure as it existed at the time the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. Carrillo v. De la GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. All Parties & PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.